Loading...
DePaul University Libraries
Screenreader assistance: To improve accessibility we have several tips for navigating the Article Detail.
Heading levels are available for easier navigation
Skip to Citation
Skip to Main Content
Skip to Find box
or use access key = 2
Can feminist judges make a difference?
Results Navigation
Format and Delivery Options
View:
Citation
This PDF document opens in a frame, to view the document outside of a frame, please change your Adobe Reader settings. To do this, open Adobe Reader, go to Help Menu and select Accessibility Setup Assistant option then select Use Recommend Settings and Skip Setup. You only need to do this once with the current computer you are using.
PDF Full Text
(168KB)
Delivery Options:
Cited References
Cited References
(7)
Citation Detail
Title:
Can feminist judges make a difference?
Authors:
Hunter, Rosemary
1
R.C.Hunter@kent.ac.uk
Source:
International Journal of the Legal Profession; Mar2008, Vol. 15 Issue 1/2, p7-36, 30p
Document Type:
Article
Subject Terms:
*FEMINISTS
*SOCIAL reformers
*JUDGES
*LEGAL professions
*COURTS -- Officials & employees
NAICS/Industry Codes:
922110 Courts
Abstract:
Many of the expectations and aspirations about the 'difference' that women judges would make have proved unrealistic, given the inevitable diversity and often conservatism of women appointed as judges. On the other hand, we might reasonably expect feminist judges to 'make a difference'. This essay focuses on feminist judges, and seeks to identify what it is that we might reasonably expect of them. This in turn requires consideration of who counts as a feminist judge, what might be included in a feminist approach to judging, and what institutional norms inherent within the judicial role might constrain the adoption of a feminist approach. The essay concludes that feminist judges both can and ought to make a difference across a wide range of judicial activities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of International Journal of the Legal Profession is the property of Routledge and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.
(Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Author Affiliations:
1
Kent Law School, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK
ISSN:
09695958
DOI:
10.1080/09695950802439759
Accession Number:
35163317
Persistent link to this record (Permalink):
Database:
Academic Search Premier
View Links:
Find Full Text
Publisher Logo:
Format and Delivery Options
View:
Citation
This PDF document opens in a frame, to view the document outside of a frame, please change your Adobe Reader settings. To do this, open Adobe Reader, go to Help Menu and select Accessibility Setup Assistant option then select Use Recommend Settings and Skip Setup. You only need to do this once with the current computer you are using.
PDF Full Text
(168KB)
Delivery Options:
Cited References
Cited References
(7)
Results Navigation