Gender, race, bias and perspective: OR, how otherness colours your judgment

Citation Detail

Title:

Gender, race, bias and perspective: OR, how otherness colours your judgment.

Authors:

Graycar, Reg¹

Source:

International Journal of the Legal Profession; Mar2008, Vol. 15 Issue 1/2, p73-86, 14p

Document Type:

Article

Subject Terms:

*GENDER
*RACE
*DISCRIMINATION
*PREJUDICES
*ADMINISTRATIVE discretion

Abstract:

This discussion considers assumptions about judges and judging and suggests that despite what is sometimes perceived as increasing diversity on the bench and in the legal profession, outsider decision makers' membership of the jurisprudential community is still marked by 'otherness'. The argument draws upon my ongoing interest in the law's concern with the concepts of 'objectivity', 'neutrality' and 'perspective'. I argue that the legal system is inherently suspicious of 'otherness' and most specifically so when 'others' occupy positions of 'judgement'. The consequence is to render decisions made by 'otherised' judges liable to attack for bias in a way that decisions made by insiders simply are not. The argument is illustrated by a review of a number of challenges made on the ground of 'bias' or recusal motions to judges whose failure to match the white Anglo hetero-normative standard of 'the judge' is seen as a limit on their ability to be 'impartial'. The examples used range across many jurisdictions, from Australia, Canada, the US and a challenge to the impartiality of a decision of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

 

Copyright of International Journal of the Legal Profession is the property of Routledge and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Author Affiliations:

¹Sydney Law School, The University of Sydney, Australia

ISSN:

09695958

DOI:

10.1080/09695950802439734

Accession Number:

35163314

Persistent link to this record (Permalink):

Database:

Academic Search Premier

View Links:

Find Full Text  

Publisher Logo: