Loading...
DePaul University Libraries
Screenreader assistance: To improve accessibility we have several tips for navigating the Article Detail.
Heading levels are available for easier navigation
Skip to Citation
Skip to Main Content
Skip to Find box
or use access key = 2
What a difference difference makes: gendered harms and judicial diversity
Results Navigation
Format and Delivery Options
View:
Citation
This PDF document opens in a frame, to view the document outside of a frame, please change your Adobe Reader settings. To do this, open Adobe Reader, go to Help Menu and select Accessibility Setup Assistant option then select Use Recommend Settings and Skip Setup. You only need to do this once with the current computer you are using.
PDF Full Text
(123KB)
Delivery Options:
Cited References
Cited References
(7)
Citation Detail
Title:
What a difference difference makes: gendered harms and judicial diversity.
Authors:
Rackley, Erika
1
erika.rackley@durham.ac.uk
Source:
International Journal of the Legal Profession; Mar2008, Vol. 15 Issue 1/2, p37-56, 20p
Document Type:
Article
Subject Terms:
*SEX discrimination
*SEX & law
*DISCRIMINATION
*JUDICIAL discretion
*ADMINISTRATIVE discretion
LAW & legislation
Abstract:
Taking the UK Ministry of Justice's ongoing quest to ensure a more diverse judiciary as its starting point and backdrop, this paper establishes the House of Lords' decision in Secretary of State for the Home Department v. K (FC); Fornah (FC) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2006] as a lens through which to explore the 'difference' of the woman judge and, in particular, the developing jurisprudence of Baroness Haleāthe first (and only) female law lord in the UK. It argues that Baroness Hale's candid recognition and articulation of the gendered nature of the experiences and violence in Fornah's story reveals not only the difference difference (in whatever form) might make to understandings of the judge, judging and justice but also the importance of recognising the transformative potential of judicial diversity to create a space in which difference is celebrated and valued on its own terms, a place where difference can truly make a difference. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of International Journal of the Legal Profession is the property of Routledge and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.
(Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Author Affiliations:
1
Durham Law School, Durham, UK
ISSN:
09695958
DOI:
10.1080/09695950802439783
Accession Number:
35163316
Persistent link to this record (Permalink):
Database:
Academic Search Premier
View Links:
Find Full Text
Publisher Logo:
Format and Delivery Options
View:
Citation
This PDF document opens in a frame, to view the document outside of a frame, please change your Adobe Reader settings. To do this, open Adobe Reader, go to Help Menu and select Accessibility Setup Assistant option then select Use Recommend Settings and Skip Setup. You only need to do this once with the current computer you are using.
PDF Full Text
(123KB)
Delivery Options:
Cited References
Cited References
(7)
Results Navigation