Loading...
DePaul University Libraries
Screenreader assistance: To improve accessibility we have several tips for navigating the Article Detail.
Heading levels are available for easier navigation
Skip to Citation
Skip to Main Content
Skip to Find box
or use access key = 2
Judging gender: difference and dissent at the Supreme Court of Canada
Results Navigation
Format and Delivery Options
View:
Citation
This PDF document opens in a frame, to view the document outside of a frame, please change your Adobe Reader settings. To do this, open Adobe Reader, go to Help Menu and select Accessibility Setup Assistant option then select Use Recommend Settings and Skip Setup. You only need to do this once with the current computer you are using.
PDF Full Text
(100KB)
Delivery Options:
Cited References
Cited References
(9)
Citation Detail
Title:
Judging gender: difference and dissent at the Supreme Court of Canada.
Images
Authors:
Belleau, Marie-Claire
1
Marie-Claire.Belleau@fd.ulaval.ca
Johnson, Rebecca
2
rjohnson@uvic.ca
Source:
International Journal of the Legal Profession; Mar2008, Vol. 15 Issue 1/2, p57-71, 15p, 2 charts
Document Type:
Article
Subject Terms:
*SEX discrimination
*DISCRIMINATION
*APPELLATE courts
TRIAL courts
Geographic Terms:
CANADA
Abstract:
Over 25 years ago, Justice Bertha Wilson asked “Will women judges really make a difference?” Taking up her question, we consider the place of difference in gender and judging. Our focus is on those 'differences of opinion' between judges that take the form of written and published judicial dissent. We present and interrogate recent statistics about practices of dissent on the Supreme Court of Canada in relation to gender. The statistics are provocative, but do not provide straightforward answers about gender and judging. They do, however, pose new questions, and suggest the importance of better theorizing and exploring the space of dissent. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of International Journal of the Legal Profession is the property of Routledge and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.
(Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Author Affiliations:
1
Faculty of Law, Universite Laval, Canada
2
Faculty of Law, University of Victoria, Canada
ISSN:
09695958
DOI:
10.1080/09695950802439700
Accession Number:
35163315
Persistent link to this record (Permalink):
Database:
Academic Search Premier
View Links:
Find Full Text
Publisher Logo:
Images:
Table 1.
Table 2.
Format and Delivery Options
View:
Citation
This PDF document opens in a frame, to view the document outside of a frame, please change your Adobe Reader settings. To do this, open Adobe Reader, go to Help Menu and select Accessibility Setup Assistant option then select Use Recommend Settings and Skip Setup. You only need to do this once with the current computer you are using.
PDF Full Text
(100KB)
Delivery Options:
Cited References
Cited References
(9)
Results Navigation